“Physics to Help Humanity”: A Review of Master of Reality: Super Relativity – The Unified Field Theory, by Mark Fiorentino
(2020). ISBN: 9798615149856
What if I were to tell you that much of what we thought we
knew about physics was either inaccurate or only the partial truth? Or that the
speed of light was not a constant? That there is ample evidence that the U.S.
government has reverse-engineered UFOs/UAPs and has at least a working
understanding of anti-gravity propulsion systems?
Still not feeling intrigued? What if the physics and
technologies that are part of Mark Fiorentino’s Super Relativity Theory could
make possible interstellar time-travel? Too big of an idea? Perhaps being
anywhere in the world in a matter of minutes, or protecting the planet from
destruction by asteroids, climate change, or other impending disasters?
Interested yet?
At 490 pages, Master
of Reality is a big book, full of big ideas and bigger possibilities.
Fiorentino is taking a page out of Dr. John Mack’s philosophy and “subverting
the dominant paradigm.” This is a difficult road to travel—Mack, an eminent,
Pulitzer Prize–winning Harvard psychologist, was nearly driven out of his
university by his colleagues and other gatekeepers for his work with abductees—and
Fiorentino treads firmly, but with clear respect for those who came before him.
He dedicates the book primarily to Einstein, as well as to Isaac Newton,
Michael Faraday, James Clerk Maxwell, and H. A. Lorentz. If you don’t recognize
that last one, he is important to this work.
Fiorentino is not shy, however, about saying that they were sometimes
wrong, and giving the reasons why. For those who are aware of the long
tradition of academic and political gatekeeping in scientific and social
science fields, sections like “Questioning the Bias that Exists When Using
Scientific Methods for Verifying Accepted Theories” and “Government Coverup of
Anti-Gravity Technology” will be of particular interest.
Although I have been reading books about Quantum Mechanics
and have copyedited a major nuclear physics publication for nearly 25 years, I
am not a scientist and my cognitive capacity does not permit me to understand
fully this complicated field. Fiorentino understands that there are many
interested readers like me also facing this obstacle. If he is to fulfill his
larger mission—to subvert paradigms, circumvent the gatekeepers, and make us
all “masters of reality”—he has to write on two different levels, rather than
limit his readership to physicists only. To accomplish this challenging task,
he has clearly marked sections meant for physicists. You don’t have to read
them. I chose to, and enough got through to make it worth the effort. For the
layperson, he breaks things down (like the old maxim: a good teacher could
explain almost anything to an eight year old) and makes even the most advanced
concepts accessible. He accomplishes this in part with the use of dozens of
figures and by using the technique of scaffolding: building concepts systematically
and using extensive repetition.
Fiorentino is not a physicist by trade, although he has been
studying Einstein’s work since he was 10 years old. A former senior software
engineer, he is trained in complex thinking and problem solving. He is also a
man of deep religious faith (which extends rather than limits his theories) and
a self-described “self-taught natural philosopher who has… developed a theory
of everything.” Because he has not locked himself into a small box with a
limited view like many academicians, Fiorentino is “not limited to using the
scientific method.” Although he doesn’t use the term transdisciplinarity, this is exactly his approach. I have been
advocating transdisciplinarity in my own field (storytelling) for decades.
Along with his faith in God and a mechanistic universe, he is a voracious
reader (sharing the links to many documents) in numerous fields and has a
PhD-level familiarity with the history of physics. He also employs the working
assumption that interstellar spaceships and travelers exist and explores near
death experiences (NDEs), because they yield data concerning the architecture
of the Universe, which he calls the Signature of God.
In an age when Quantum Physics has reached nearly mythical
proportions as the great Secret of the Universe and gateway to life-changing
spirituality (although the shine has all but gone from the 2004 film/extended
DVD What the Bleep Do We Know?),
Fiorentino is more pragmatic: What practical
good has this theoretical physics
done? We have serious challenges on Earth, and QP hasn’t done much at all to
solve them.
Instead, Fiorentino advocates his Theory of Super Relativity,
incorporating such science-fiction-sounding ideas and terms as constructing “an
interstellar spacecraft using the Slip Wave Spatial Bias Drive.” I
mentioned earlier his transdisciplinary approach, which includes the belief in NDEs
and existence of extraterrestrial life and spaceships. Before making a judgment,
take my advice: the scientific theorems at the core of this book fundamentally
depend on all of these facets. Transdisciplinarity has “allowed [Fiorentino] to
compile an enormous quantity of information from seemingly unrelated areas of
experience and [he has] carefully woven it into a fine tapestry.”
Much of Fiorentino’s focus is on magnetic fields and
their relationship to and effect on gravity, bringing to mind Nikola Tesla. In 1895,
Tesla was working on time/space manipulation of magnetic fields. When he
fearlessly (foolishly?) placed himself inside a magnetic field, he could see
past, present, and future all at once. Fiorentino’s sections on the nature of
time are an excellent companion to this claim.
Anyone who took even rudimentary science classes will be
familiar with protons, neutrons, and electrons. If you have interest in quantum
physics, you may know the terms bosons, gluons, photons, and quarks. It is here
that Fiorentino challenges basic assumptions to the greatest degree. Through
his research into NDEs, he discovered a concept he calls Knotted Tubes of
Ether, which explained his particle model. Quarks moving in a high-speed
trefoil pattern (similar to a trefoil Celtic knot) create an “electromatic
bonded solid structure.” From here he explores the mechanisms behind
anti-gravity—the Holy Grail of space travel—and presents to the reader examples
of cover-ups and gatekeeping by the scientific community and U.S. government.
Chapter 19 is called “How to Build a Warp Drive.” No
science fiction here. Considering Tesla received a patent for a flying saucer
in the early 1900s and Germany was designing and testing saucers in the 1940s
(designs either brought to the U.S. through Operation Paperclip or hidden
elsewhere, perhaps accounting for the 1947 to 1954 “flying saucer” sightings in
the United States), claims of advanced propulsion systems deserve to be taken
seriously. Several figures in this book demonstrate how these designs work.
Chapter 20, “Designing and Building an Interstellar Space Craft,” explains why
the cigar-shaped and other ubiquitous UFO/UAP designs reported over the past 80
years are viable. Fiorentino’s illustrations of the workings of a cigar-shaped
craft are intriguing, given the rumors of the use of submarine designs for interstellar
spaceships, including Solar Warden.
Consider as well the controversial paper by Harvard astronomer Avi Loeb
postulating that Oumuamua was a derelict probe ship.
Armed with his models, Fiorentino looks at black holes,
contraction of the Universe, the origin of creation/seeds of life, interdimensional
portals (stargates), time travel, the Mandela Effect, and more through new
perspectives. He does the same with two smoking guns in the UFOlogy/fringe
theory world: the Philadelphia Experiment and Montauk Project.
In the end, as Fiorentino—like Tesla—applies a lifetime
of hi-tech design work to saving humankind rather than waging war and pursuing economic
and political global conquest, he says, “All of this has been done in the name
of LOVE.”
This might be the hardest part of Master of Reality for the gatekeepers and guardians in government
and the science community to accept, because it is also the most essential to
subverting the dominant paradigms.
Comments